<!DOCTYPE html>
<html class="client-nojs vector-feature-night-mode-disabled vector-feature-language-in-header-enabled vector-feature-language-in-main-page-header-disabled vector-feature-page-tools-pinned-disabled vector-feature-toc-pinned-clientpref-1 vector-feature-main-menu-pinned-disabled vector-feature-limited-width-clientpref-1 vector-feature-limited-width-content-enabled vector-feature-custom-font-size-clientpref-1 vector-feature-appearance-pinned-clientpref-1 vector-sticky-header-enabled" lang="en" dir="ltr"><head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Alienation of affections</title>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<link rel="canonical" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alienation_of_affections"> <link href="./mw/ext.cite.styles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link href="./mw/skins.vector.icons.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link href="./mw/skins.vector.search.codex.styles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link href="./mw/skins.vector.styles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<link href="./mw/user.styles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<meta name="ResourceLoaderDynamicStyles" content="">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./mw/site.styles.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./mw/noscript.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./footer.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./vector-2022.css">
</head>
<body class="skin--responsive skin-vector skin-vector-search-vue mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Alienation_of_affections rootpage-Alienation_of_affections skin-vector-2022 action-view">
<div class="mw-page-container">
<div class="mw-page-container-inner">
<div class="mw-content-container">
<main id="content" class="mw-body">
<header class="mw-body-header vector-page-titlebar">
<h1 id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading mw-first-heading">
<span id="openzim-page-title" class="mw-page-title-main"><span class="mw-page-title-main">Alienation of affections</span></span>
</h1>
</header>
<a id="top"></a>
<div id="bodyContent" class="vector-body ve-init-mw-desktopArticleTarget-targetContainer" aria-labelledby="firstHeading" data-mw-ve-target-container="">
<div id="mw-content-text" class="mw-body-content mw-content-ltr" lang="en" dir="ltr"><div class="mw-content-ltr mw-parser-output" lang="en" dir="ltr">
<style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1129693374">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
.mw-parser-output .hlist dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul{margin:0;padding:0}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt,.mw-parser-output .hlist li{margin:0;display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ul{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist .mw-empty-li{display:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dt::after{content:": "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li::after{content:" · ";font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li:last-child::after{content:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:first-child::before{content:" (";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:last-child::after{content:")";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol{counter-reset:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li{counter-increment:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li::before{content:" "counter(listitem)"\a0 "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li ol>li:first-child::before{content:" ("counter(listitem)"\a0 "}
/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1246091330">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
.mw-parser-output .sidebar{width:22em;float:right;clear:right;margin:0.5em 0 1em 1em;background:var(--background-color-neutral-subtle,#f8f9fa);border:1px solid var(--border-color-base,#a2a9b1);padding:0.2em;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%;border-collapse:collapse;display:table}body.skin-minerva .mw-parser-output .sidebar{display:table!important;float:right!important;margin:0.5em 0 1em 1em!important}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-subgroup{width:100%;margin:0;border-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-left{float:left;clear:left;margin:0.5em 1em 1em 0}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-none{float:none;clear:both;margin:0.5em 1em 1em 0}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-outer-title{padding:0 0.4em 0.2em;font-size:125%;line-height:1.2em;font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-top-image{padding:0.4em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-top-caption,.mw-parser-output .sidebar-pretitle-with-top-image,.mw-parser-output .sidebar-caption{padding:0.2em 0.4em 0;line-height:1.2em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-pretitle{padding:0.4em 0.4em 0;line-height:1.2em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-title,.mw-parser-output .sidebar-title-with-pretitle{padding:0.2em 0.8em;font-size:145%;line-height:1.2em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-title-with-pretitle{padding:0.1em 0.4em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-image{padding:0.2em 0.4em 0.4em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-heading{padding:0.1em 0.4em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-content{padding:0 0.5em 0.4em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-content-with-subgroup{padding:0.1em 0.4em 0.2em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-above,.mw-parser-output .sidebar-below{padding:0.3em 0.8em;font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-collapse .sidebar-above,.mw-parser-output .sidebar-collapse .sidebar-below{border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-bottom:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-navbar{text-align:right;font-size:115%;padding:0 0.4em 0.4em}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-list-title{padding:0 0.4em;text-align:left;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6em;font-size:105%}.mw-parser-output .sidebar-list-title-c{padding:0 0.4em;text-align:center;margin:0 3.3em}@media(max-width:640px){body.mediawiki .mw-parser-output .sidebar{width:100%!important;clear:both;float:none!important;margin-left:0!important;margin-right:0!important}}body.skin--responsive .mw-parser-output .sidebar a>img{max-width:none!important}@media screen{html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .sidebar:not(.notheme) .sidebar-list-title,html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .sidebar:not(.notheme) .sidebar-title-with-pretitle{background:transparent!important}html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .sidebar:not(.notheme) .sidebar-title-with-pretitle a{color:var(--color-progressive)!important}}@media screen and (prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .sidebar:not(.notheme) .sidebar-list-title,html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .sidebar:not(.notheme) .sidebar-title-with-pretitle{background:transparent!important}html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .sidebar:not(.notheme) .sidebar-title-with-pretitle a{color:var(--color-progressive)!important}}@media print{body.ns-0 .mw-parser-output .sidebar{display:none!important}}
/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1202158006">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
.mw-parser-output .law-sidebar .sidebar-heading{background:#aaddff;color:#000}.mw-parser-output .law-sidebar .sidebar-above{font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .law-sidebar .sidebar-below{padding:0.4em;border-top:1px #aaa solid;font-weight:normal;font-size:smaller}
/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style><table class="sidebar nomobile nowraplinks hlist law-sidebar"><tbody><tr><td class="sidebar-pretitle">Part of the <a href="Common_law" title="Common law">common law</a> series</td></tr><tr><th class="sidebar-title-with-pretitle"><a href="Tort" title="Tort">Tort law</a></th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<small>(<a href="Outline_of_tort_law" title="Outline of tort law">Outline</a>)</small></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
<a href="Trespass_to_the_person" class="mw-redirect" title="Trespass to the person">Trespass to the person</a></th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Assault_(tort)" title="Assault (tort)">Assault</a></li>
<li><a href="Battery_(tort)" title="Battery (tort)">Battery</a></li>
<li><a href="False_imprisonment" title="False imprisonment">False imprisonment</a></li>
<li><span class="wraplinks"><a href="Intentional_infliction_of_emotional_distress" title="Intentional infliction of emotional distress">Intentional infliction of emotional distress</a></span></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
Property torts</th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Trespass" title="Trespass">Trespass</a>
<ul><li><a href="Trespass_to_land" title="Trespass to land">land</a></li>
<li><a href="Trespass_to_chattels" title="Trespass to chattels">chattels</a></li></ul></li>
<li><a href="Conversion_(law)" title="Conversion (law)">Conversion</a></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
<a href="Dignitary_tort" title="Dignitary tort">Dignitary torts</a></th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Personality_rights" title="Personality rights">Appropriation</a></li>
<li><a href="Defamation" title="Defamation">Defamation</a>
<ul><li><a href="Unintentional_defamation" title="Unintentional defamation">Unintentional</a></li></ul></li>
<li><a href="False_light" title="False light">False light</a></li>
<li><a href="Expectation_of_privacy_(United_States)" class="mw-redirect" title="Expectation of privacy (United States)">Invasion of privacy</a>
<ul><li><a href="Intrusion_on_seclusion" title="Intrusion on seclusion">Intrusion on seclusion</a></li></ul></li>
<li><a href="Breach_of_confidence" title="Breach of confidence">Breach of confidence</a></li>
<li><a href="Abuse_of_process" title="Abuse of process">Abuse of process</a></li>
<li><a href="Malicious_prosecution" title="Malicious prosecution">Malicious prosecution</a></li>
<li>Sexual torts
<ul>
<li><a href="Criminal_conversation" title="Criminal conversation">Criminal conversation</a></li>
<li><a href="Seduction_(tort)" title="Seduction (tort)">Seduction</a></li>
<li><a href="Breach_of_promise" title="Breach of promise">Breach of promise</a></li></ul></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
<a href="Negligence" title="Negligence">Negligent torts</a></th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Negligent_infliction_of_emotional_distress" title="Negligent infliction of emotional distress">Negligent infliction of emotional distress</a></li>
<li><a href="Negligence_in_employment" title="Negligence in employment">Employment-related</a></li>
<li><a href="Negligent_entrustment" title="Negligent entrustment">Entrustment</a></li>
<li><a href="Malpractice" title="Malpractice">Malpractice</a>
<ul><li><a href="Legal_malpractice" title="Legal malpractice">legal</a></li>
<li><a href="Medical_malpractice" title="Medical malpractice">medical</a></li></ul></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
<a href="Calculus_of_negligence" class="mw-redirect" title="Calculus of negligence">Principles of negligence</a></th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Duty_of_care" title="Duty of care">Duty of care</a>
<ul><li><a href="Trespasser" title="Trespasser">Trespassers</a></li>
<li><a href="Licensee" title="Licensee">Licensees</a></li>
<li><a href="Invitee" title="Invitee">Invitees</a></li></ul></li>
<li><a href="Standard_of_care" title="Standard of care">Standard of care</a>
<ul><li><a href="Reasonable_person" title="Reasonable person">Reasonable person</a></li></ul></li>
<li><a href="Proximate_cause" title="Proximate cause">Proximate cause</a></li>
<li><i><a href="Res_ipsa_loquitur" title="Res ipsa loquitur">Res ipsa loquitur</a></i></li>
<li><a href="Restitutio_ad_integrum" title="Restitutio ad integrum">Restitutio ad integrum</a></li>
<li><a href="Rescue_doctrine" title="Rescue doctrine">Rescue doctrine</a></li>
<li><a href="Duty_to_rescue" title="Duty to rescue">Duty to rescue</a></li>
<li><a href="Comparative_responsibility" title="Comparative responsibility">Comparative responsibility</a></li>
<li><a href="Contributory_negligence" title="Contributory negligence">Contributory negligence</a></li>
<li><a href="Attractive_nuisance_doctrine" title="Attractive nuisance doctrine">Attractive nuisance</a></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
<a href="Strict_liability" title="Strict liability">Strict</a> and <a href="Absolute_liability" title="Absolute liability">absolute</a> liability</th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Product_liability" title="Product liability">Product liability</a></li>
<li><a href="Ultrahazardous_activity" title="Ultrahazardous activity">Ultrahazardous activity</a></li>
<li><a href="Deep_pocket#Deep_pocket_in_law_and_economics" title="Deep pocket">Deep pockets</a></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
<a href="Nuisance" title="Nuisance">Nuisance</a></th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Public_nuisance" title="Public nuisance">Public nuisance</a></li>
<li><i><a href="Rylands_v_Fletcher" title="Rylands v Fletcher">Rylands v Fletcher</a></i></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
<a href="Economic_torts" title="Economic torts">Economic torts</a></th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Civil_conspiracy" title="Civil conspiracy">Conspiracy</a></li>
<li><a href="Restraint_of_trade" title="Restraint of trade">Restraint of trade</a></li>
<li><a href="Insurance_bad_faith" title="Insurance bad faith">Insurance bad faith</a> <small>(American law)</small></li>
<li><a href="Fraud" title="Fraud">Fraud</a></li>
<li><a href="Tortious_interference" title="Tortious interference">Tortious interference</a></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
<a href="Tort#Defenses" title="Tort">Defences</a></th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Assumption_of_risk" title="Assumption of risk">Assumption of risk</a></li>
<li><a href="Consent" title="Consent">Consent</a></li>
<li><a href="Necessity_(tort)" title="Necessity (tort)">Necessity</a></li>
<li><a href="Statute_of_limitations" title="Statute of limitations">Statute of limitations</a></li>
<li><a href="Right_of_self-defense" title="Right of self-defense">Self-defense</a>
<ul><li><a href="Right_of_self-defense#Defense_of_others" title="Right of self-defense">Defense of others</a></li></ul></li>
<li><a href="Defence_of_property" title="Defence of property">Defence of property</a></li>
<li><a href="Shopkeeper's_privilege" title="Shopkeeper's privilege">Shopkeeper's privilege</a></li>
<li><a href="Neutral_reportage" title="Neutral reportage">Neutral reportage</a></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
Liability</th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Intentional_tort" title="Intentional tort">Intentional torts</a></li>
<li><a href="Last_clear_chance" title="Last clear chance">Last clear chance</a></li>
<li><a href="Eggshell_skull" title="Eggshell skull">Eggshell skull</a></li>
<li><a href="Vicarious_liability" title="Vicarious liability">Vicarious liability</a></li>
<li><i><a href="Respondeat_superior" title="Respondeat superior">Respondeat superior</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="Volenti_non_fit_injuria" title="Volenti non fit injuria">Volenti non fit injuria</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="Ex_turpi_causa_non_oritur_actio" title="Ex turpi causa non oritur actio">Ex turpi causa non oritur actio</a></i></li>
<li><a href="Joint_and_several_liability" title="Joint and several liability">Joint and several liability</a></li>
<li><a href="Market_share_liability" title="Market share liability">Market share liability</a></li>
<li><a href="Transferred_intent" title="Transferred intent">Transferred intent</a></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
<a href="Legal_remedy" title="Legal remedy">Legal remedy</a></th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Damages" title="Damages">Damages</a>
<ul><li><a href="Punitive_damages" title="Punitive damages">Punitive</a></li>
<li><a href="Consequential_damages" title="Consequential damages">Special</a></li>
<li><a href="Incidental_damages" title="Incidental damages">Incidental</a></li></ul></li>
<li><a href="Injunction" title="Injunction">Injunction</a></li>
<li><a href="Tracing_(law)" title="Tracing (law)">Tracing</a></li>
<li><a href="Detinue" title="Detinue">Detinue</a></li>
<li><a href="Replevin" title="Replevin">Replevin</a></li>
<li><a href="Trover" title="Trover">Trover</a></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
Other topics in tort law</th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Tort_reform" title="Tort reform">Tort reform</a>
<ul><li><a href="Non-economic_damages_caps" title="Non-economic damages caps">Non-economic damages caps</a></li></ul></li>
<li><a href="Quasi-tort" title="Quasi-tort">Quasi-tort</a></li>
<li><a href="Delict" title="Delict">Delict</a> <small>(term used for torts in some <a href="Civil_law_(legal_system)" title="Civil law (legal system)">civil</a> and <a href="List_of_national_legal_systems" title="List of national legal systems">mixed legal systems</a>)</small></li>
<li><a href="Conflict_of_tort_laws" title="Conflict of tort laws">Conflict of tort laws</a></li>
<li><a href="Private_attorney_general" title="Private attorney general">Private attorney general</a></li>
<li><a href="Class_action" title="Class action">Class action</a></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
By jurisdiction</th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Tort_law_in_Australia" title="Tort law in Australia">Australia</a></li>
<li><a href="Canadian_tort_law" title="Canadian tort law">Canada</a></li>
<li><a href="Tort_law_in_China" title="Tort law in China">China</a></li>
<li><a href="English_tort_law" title="English tort law">England and Wales</a></li>
<li><a href="European_tort_law" title="European tort law">European Union</a></li>
<li><a href="Tort_law_in_India" title="Tort law in India">India</a></li>
<li><a href="Law_of_Japan#Torts" title="Law of Japan">Japan</a></li>
<li><a href="Law_of_Taiwan#Torts" title="Law of Taiwan">Taiwan</a></li>
<li><a href="United_States_tort_law" title="United States tort law">United States</a></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><th class="sidebar-heading">
Other <a href="Common_law" title="Common law">common law</a> areas</th></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-content nowrapitems">
<ul><li><a href="Contract" title="Contract">Contracts</a></li>
<li><a href="Criminal_law" title="Criminal law">Criminal law</a></li>
<li><a href="Evidence_(law)" title="Evidence (law)">Evidence</a></li>
<li><a href="Property_law" title="Property law">Property</a></li>
<li><a href="Will_and_testament" title="Will and testament">Wills</a>, <a href="Trust_(law)" title="Trust (law)">trusts</a>, and <a href="Estate_(law)" title="Estate (law)">estates</a></li></ul></td>
</tr><tr><td class="sidebar-below">
<ul><li><span class="nowrap"><span class="skin-invert-image noviewer" typeof="mw:File"></span> </span><a href="Portal%3ALaw" title="Portal:Law">Law portal</a></li></ul></td></tr><tr><td class="sidebar-navbar"><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1239400231">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
.mw-parser-output .navbar{display:inline;font-size:88%;font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .navbar-collapse{float:left;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .navbar-boxtext{word-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .navbar ul{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap;line-height:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::before{margin-right:-0.125em;content:"[ "}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::after{margin-left:-0.125em;content:" ]"}.mw-parser-output .navbar li{word-spacing:-0.125em}.mw-parser-output .navbar a>span,.mw-parser-output .navbar a>abbr{text-decoration:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-mini abbr{font-variant:small-caps;border-bottom:none;text-decoration:none;cursor:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-full{font-size:114%;margin:0 7em}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-mini{font-size:114%;margin:0 4em}html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .navbar li a abbr{color:var(--color-base)!important}@media(prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .navbar li a abbr{color:var(--color-base)!important}}@media print{.mw-parser-output .navbar{display:none!important}}
/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style></td></tr></tbody></table>
<p><b>Alienation of affections</b> is a <a href="Common_law" title="Common law">common law</a> <a href="Tort" title="Tort">tort</a>, abolished in many jurisdictions. Where it still exists, an action is brought by a spouse against a third party alleged to be responsible for damaging the marriage, most often resulting in divorce. The defendant in an alienation of affections suit is typically an adulterous spouse's lover, although family members, counselors, and therapists or clergy members who have advised a spouse to seek divorce have also been sued for alienation of affections.<sup id="cite_ref-edition.cnn.com_1-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-edition.cnn.com-1"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>1<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>The tort of alienation of affections often overlaps with another "heart balm" tort: <a href="Criminal_conversation" title="Criminal conversation">criminal conversation</a>. Alienation of affections has most in common with the tort of <a href="Tortious_interference" title="Tortious interference">tortious interference</a>, where a third party can be held liable for interfering with the contractual relationship between two parties.
</p>
<meta property="mw:PageProp/toc">
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="Legal_requirements">Legal requirements</h2></div>
<p>An action for alienation of affection does not require proof of <a href="Extramarital_sex" title="Extramarital sex">extramarital sex</a>. An alienation claim is difficult to establish because it comprises several elements and there are several defenses.
</p><p>To succeed on an alienation claim, the plaintiff has to show the following elements:
</p>
<ol><li>the marriage entailed love between the spouses in some degree;</li>
<li>the spousal love was alienated;</li>
<li>the defendant's malicious conduct contributed to or caused the loss of affection.</li></ol>
<p>It is not necessary to show that the defendant set out to destroy the marital relationship, but only that he or she intentionally engaged in acts which would foreseeably impact the marriage.
</p><p>Thus, the defendant has a defense against an alienation claim where it can be shown that he or she did not know that the object of his or her affections was in fact married. It is not a defense that the guilty spouse consented to the defendant's conduct, but it might be a defense that the defendant was not the active and aggressive seducer.
</p><p>If the defendant's conduct was somehow inadvertent, the plaintiff would be unable to show intentional or malicious action. But prior marital problems do not establish a defense unless such unhappiness had reached a level of negating love between the spouses.
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="Australia">Australia</h2></div>
<p>Alienation of affection actions in Australia stopped being <a href="Good_law" title="Good law">good law</a> since 1975, with the passing of the <a href="Family_Law_Act_1975" title="Family Law Act 1975">Family Law Act 1975</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-2"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>2<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> In the new system, outlined by the statute, there exists a fault-less ground of divorce, and that is irretrievable breakdown of a marriage, which is evidenced by 12 months of separation. Spousal behaviour though, can be a consideration a court may take into account during a property settlement.
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="Canada">Canada</h2></div>
<p>The <a href="Supreme_Court_of_Canada" title="Supreme Court of Canada">Supreme Court of Canada</a> held that alienation of affection and the related tort cause of action for "criminal conversation" was not available as a cause of action in the year 1962 in the case of <i>Kungl v. Schiefer</i>, S.C.R. 443.<sup id="cite_ref-3" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-3"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>3<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> The basis for the claim by the party suing in an Ontario case had been that Canada incorporated by reference the law of England as of the year 1792, but the Supreme Court of Canada held that England did not recognize that tort in the year 1792, so it was not a part of the law of Canada.
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="United_States">United States</h2></div>
<p>As of 2016, alienation of affections was recognized in six <a href="United_States" title="United States">United States</a> jurisdictions: <a href="Hawaii" title="Hawaii">Hawaii</a>, <a href="North_Carolina" title="North Carolina">North Carolina</a>, <a href="Mississippi" title="Mississippi">Mississippi</a>, <a href="New_Mexico" title="New Mexico">New Mexico</a>, <a href="South_Dakota" title="South Dakota">South Dakota</a>, and <a href="Utah" title="Utah">Utah</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-4" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-4"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>4<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-5" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-5"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>5<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> The <a href="U.S._Supreme_Court" class="mw-redirect" title="U.S. Supreme Court">U.S. Supreme Court</a> has declined to consider the constitutionality of such torts by <a href="Writ_of_certiorari" class="mw-redirect" title="Writ of certiorari">writ of certiorari</a>, notwithstanding academic commentary suggesting that these torts are unconstitutional under the <a href="United_States_Constitution" class="mw-redirect" title="United States Constitution">United States Constitution</a> and relevant modern precedents decided based upon it, including <i><a href="Obergefell_v._Hodges" title="Obergefell v. Hodges">Obergefell v. Hodges</a></i>, that struck down laws prohibiting same sex marriage in the United States.<sup id="cite_ref-6" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-6"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>6<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> The U.S. Supreme Court has addressed the tort in several cases that did not question its constitutionality, including <i>U.S. v. Kaiser</i>, 363 U.S. 299, 310 (1960) (dissenting opinion) (tax treatment of damages awards); <i>Lykes v. U.S.</i>, 343 U.S. 118, 126 (1952) (tax deductions for litigation costs); <i>Sherrer v. Sherrer</i>, 334 U.S. 343, 373 (1948) (dissenting opinion) (full faith and credit afforded to divorce judgments); <i>Shepard v. United States,</i> 290 U.S. 96, 105 (1933) (admissibility of evidence); <i>Tinker v. Colwell</i>, 193 U.S. 473, 474 (1904) (availability of discharge of damages awards in bankruptcy); <i>Waldron v. Waldron</i>, 156 U.S. 361, 362–64 (1895) (preservation of objections to evidence when transcripts from a related proceeding are introduced). The U.S. Supreme Court has never granted certiorari on the constitutionality of the tort.
</p><p>The tort of alienation of affection was inherited as part of the common law. The law was codified in some states, the first one being <a href="New_York_(state)" title="New York (state)">New York</a> with legislation in 1864, and similar legislation existed in many <a href="U.S._state" title="U.S. state">U.S. states</a> in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
</p><p>Since 1935, this tort has been abolished in 42 states, including New York<sup id="cite_ref-NYLaw_7-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-NYLaw-7"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>7<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> and Illinois.<sup id="cite_ref-ILLaw_8-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ILLaw-8"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>8<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Most states have abolished the action by legislation, but some came to an end by judicial review.
</p><p>For example, in 1927, actions for alienation of affection were abolished in <a href="Louisiana" title="Louisiana">Louisiana</a> as a result of <i>Moulin v. Monteleone</i>, 165 La. 169, 115 So. 447. See also South Carolina case <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar_case?case=15581990677146317828&hl=en&as_sdt=2006&as_vis=1"><i>Russo v. Sutton</i></a>, 422 SE 2d 750 (1992), abolishing the <a href="Heart_balm" class="mw-redirect" title="Heart balm">heart balm</a> action for alienation of affection.
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Hawaii">Hawaii</h3></div>
<p>In <a href="Hawaii" title="Hawaii">Hawaii</a>, the plaintiff has to prove his spouse did not seek the defendant, and has to show a lack of any marital fault.<sup id="cite_ref-:0_9-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:0-9"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>9<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Mississippi">Mississippi</h3></div>
<p>In 2007, the <a href="Mississippi_Supreme_Court" class="mw-redirect" title="Mississippi Supreme Court">Mississippi Supreme Court</a>, in <i>Fitch v. Valentine</i>, in which the cheated husband, Johnny Valentine, received $750,000, upheld the constitutionality of the state's alienation of affection law.<sup id="cite_ref-10" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-10"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>10<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-11" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-11"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>11<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-12" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-12"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>12<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> Among the notable cases is Pickering v. Pickering, in which the wife of former U.S. Congressman <a href="Chip_Pickering" title="Chip Pickering">Chip Pickering</a> sued his college sweetheart Elizabeth Creekmore Byrd for alienation of affection, also claiming that Pickering turn down Mississippi Gov. <a href="Haley_Barbour" title="Haley Barbour">Haley Barbour</a>'s 2007 offer of former Sen. <a href="Trent_Lott" title="Trent Lott">Trent Lott</a>'s Senate seat so that Pickering could divorce her and he and the defendant could be together.<sup id="cite_ref-13" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-13"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>13<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-14" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-14"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>14<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-15" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-15"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>15<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="New_Mexico">New Mexico</h3></div>
<p>The law was confirmed in 1999 by the <a href="New_Mexico_Supreme_Court" title="New Mexico Supreme Court">New Mexico Supreme Court</a>, although the field was heavily restricted, the courts viewing this cause of action with disfavor.<sup id="cite_ref-16" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-16"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>16<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-:0_9-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:0-9"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>9<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="North_Carolina">North Carolina</h3></div>
<p>Alienation of affection and <a href="Criminal_conversation" title="Criminal conversation">criminal conversation</a> lawsuits are allowed in North Carolina. It is estimated that over 200 alienation of affection cases are filed in North Carolina each year.
</p><p>Million-dollar verdicts have not been uncommon in North Carolina for alienation of affection and emotional distress.<sup id="cite_ref-auto_17-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-auto-17"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>17<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> In March 2010, a wife won a $9 million suit against her husband's mistress.<sup id="cite_ref-18" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-18"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>18<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> A Mecklenburg County jury awarded $1.4 million in May 2001 to a former wrestling coach against P, after the coach's wife left him for P (the jury verdict was later reduced by the <a href="North_Carolina_Court_of_Appeals" title="North Carolina Court of Appeals">North Carolina Court of Appeals</a> as excessive). A year 2000 verdict of $86,250 for alienation of affections and $15,000 for criminal conversation in the case of Pharr v. Beck, from Burke county was upheld on appeal. In 1997, in the case of Hutelmyer v. Cox, the Plaintiff wife was awarded $1 million against her husband's secretary who "dressed sexy at work" and had an affair with him destroying their marriage.<sup id="cite_ref-auto_17-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-auto-17"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>17<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> In 2011, Betty Devin was ordered to pay $30 million to Carol Puryear for alienating Donald Puryear from her, causing their divorce.<sup id="cite_ref-19" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-19"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>19<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-20" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-20"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>20<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>In North Carolina such lawsuits can be filed only for conduct prior to a separation; although, prior to changes in the law which went into effect in October 2009, the tort of criminal conversion applied to post-separation conduct as well.<sup id="cite_ref-ncga.state.nc.us_21-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ncga.state.nc.us-21"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>21<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>The <a href="North_Carolina_General_Assembly" title="North Carolina General Assembly">North Carolina legislature</a> has repeatedly had bills to abolish the tort introduced, and declined to do so.<sup id="cite_ref-22" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-22"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>22<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> In 2009, the <a href="North_Carolina_General_Assembly" title="North Carolina General Assembly">General Assembly</a> approved legislation which placed some additional limits on such lawsuits.<sup id="cite_ref-23" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-23"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>23<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> The bill was signed into law by Governor <a href="Bev_Perdue" title="Bev Perdue">Bev Perdue</a> on August 3, 2009, and is codified under Chapter 52 of the North Carolina General Statutes:<sup id="cite_ref-24" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-24"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>24<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1244412712">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
.mw-parser-output .templatequote{overflow:hidden;margin:1em 0;padding:0 32px}.mw-parser-output .templatequotecite{line-height:1.5em;text-align:left;margin-top:0}@media(min-width:500px){.mw-parser-output .templatequotecite{padding-left:1.6em}}
/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style><blockquote class="templatequote"><p><b>§ 52-13. Procedures in causes of action for alienation of affection and criminal conversation.</b>
</p><p><b>(a)</b> No act of the <a href="Defendant" title="Defendant">defendant</a> shall give rise to a <a href="Cause_of_action" title="Cause of action">cause of action</a> for alienation of affection
or criminal conversation that occurs after the <a href="Plaintiff" title="Plaintiff">plaintiff</a> and the plaintiff's spouse physically separate with the intent of either the plaintiff or plaintiff's spouse that the physical separation remain permanent.
</p><p><b>(b)</b> An action for alienation of affection or criminal conversation shall not be commenced more than <a href="Statute_of_limitations" title="Statute of limitations">three years</a> from the last act of the defendant giving rise to the cause of action.
</p>
<p><b>(c)</b> A person may commence a cause of action for alienation of affection or criminal conversation against a <a href="Natural_person" title="Natural person">natural person</a> only.<sup id="cite_ref-ncga.state.nc.us_21-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-ncga.state.nc.us-21"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>21<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup></p></blockquote>
<p>An Alienation of Affections suit may be brought against an employer if one of these three circumstances is evident.
</p>
<ol><li>The employer authorized the employee's acts;</li>
<li>The employee's acts were committed within the scope of his employment and in furtherance of the employer's business; or</li>
<li>The employer ratifies the employee's acts.</li></ol>
<p>Each of the three limitations arose from a recent North Carolina legal case involving the tort.
</p>
<ol><li>In <i>Jones v. Skelly</i>, N.C.App. 2009, the North Carolina Court of Appeals had held that the tort applies even to legally separated spouses.</li>
<li>In <i>Mesenheimer v. Burris</i>, N.C. 2006, the North Carolina Supreme Court held that the statute of limitation commences when the affair should have been discovered rather than when it occurred.</li>
<li>In <i>Smith v. Lee</i>, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78987, the Federal District Court for the Western District of North Carolina noted that the question of whether an employer could be held liable for an affair conducted by an employee (<i>e.g.</i> while on a business trip for the employer) was still unsettled in North Carolina.</li></ol>
<p>There is often confusion over where an employee's "scope of employment" ends. An example of this would be a minister having sex with a person that has been receiving counseling services from that minister. In theory the minister is acting within the scope of employment because it is their duty to provide these counseling services and it is through these services that they gain access to the victim.
</p><p>In 2014, Resident Superior Court Judge John O. Craig dismissed the case of Rothrock v. Cooke, ruling that the state's criminal conversion and alienation of affection laws were unconstitutional, infringing up on 1st and 14th amendment rights in the U.S. Constitution.<sup id="cite_ref-25" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-25"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>25<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-26" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-26"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>26<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> That case was not appealed. In 2017, the North Carolina Court of Appeals, in a different case, ruled that the common law cause of action of alienation of affection was not facially invalid under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.<sup id="cite_ref-27" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-27"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>27<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>In 2017 the North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled in a 3-0 decision to uphold the constitutionality of the tort. See Malecek v. Williams 807 S.E.2d 574.
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="South_Dakota">South Dakota</h3></div>
<p>In 2002 the law was reworded to be gender-neutral, allowing wives to sue another woman.<sup id="cite_ref-:1_28-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:1-28"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>28<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>A man was awarded $950,000, later reduced to $400,000, in a 2002 case in which a South Dakota jury ruled that an <a href="Orthopedic_surgery" title="Orthopedic surgery">orthopedic surgeon</a> from <a href="Las_Vegas" title="Las Vegas">Las Vegas</a> had enticed the man's wife into an affair and had broken up their marriage.<sup id="cite_ref-:1_28-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:1-28"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>28<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>On 2007 it was ruled defenders in cases of alienation of affection were not entitled to be covered by their insurances, as this is an intentional tort.<sup id="cite_ref-29" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-29"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>29<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-30" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-30"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>30<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>Punitive damages are limited to 20% of the defendant's worth.<sup id="cite_ref-:0_9-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-:0-9"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>9<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading3"><h3 id="Utah">Utah</h3></div>
<p>Both in 1983 and eight years later in 1991, the <a href="Utah_Supreme_Court" title="Utah Supreme Court">Utah Supreme Court</a> confirmed the legality of such claims, although Justice <a href="Christine_M._Durham" title="Christine M. Durham">Christine M. Durham</a> dissented in both cases, describing alienation of affection as "an anachronistic holdover from a bygone era, which modern rationalizations have failed to justify." However, in the 1991 ruling, they disallowed <a href="Criminal_conversation" title="Criminal conversation">criminal conversation</a> claims<sup id="cite_ref-31" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-31"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>31<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> The same court confirmed alienation of affections as a cause of action in 2002.<sup id="cite_ref-32" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-32"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>32<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p><p>Among the notables cases were Jason Miles Williams, who attempted several times to sue the <a href="Fundamentalist_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-Day_Saints" title="Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints">Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints</a> leadership for causing his divorce by saying his wife would be damned if she did not divorce<sup id="cite_ref-33" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-33"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>33<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup> and Janice Peck suing the <a href="Utah_Division_of_Wildlife_Resources" title="Utah Division of Wildlife Resources">Utah Division of Wildlife Resources</a> after her husband left her for his new wife he met while posing as a couple to track <a href="Poachers" class="mw-redirect" title="Poachers">poachers</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-34" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-34"><span class="cite-bracket">[</span>34<span class="cite-bracket">]</span></a></sup>
</p>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="References">References</h2></div>
<style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1239543626">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
.mw-parser-output .reflist{margin-bottom:0.5em;list-style-type:decimal}@media screen{.mw-parser-output .reflist{font-size:90%}}.mw-parser-output .reflist .references{font-size:100%;margin-bottom:0;list-style-type:inherit}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-2{column-width:30em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns-3{column-width:25em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns{margin-top:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns ol{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .reflist-columns li{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-alpha{list-style-type:upper-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-upper-roman{list-style-type:upper-roman}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-alpha{list-style-type:lower-alpha}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-greek{list-style-type:lower-greek}.mw-parser-output .reflist-lower-roman{list-style-type:lower-roman}
/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style><div class="reflist">
<div class="mw-references-wrap mw-references-columns"><ol class="references">
<li id="cite_note-edition.cnn.com-1"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-edition.cnn.com_1-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r1238218222">
/* start https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
.mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit;word-wrap:break-word}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"\"""\"""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .citation:target{background-color:rgba(0,127,255,0.133)}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-free.id-lock-free a{background:url("./mw/Lock-green.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited.id-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration.id-lock-registration a{background:url("./mw/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription.id-lock-subscription a{background:url("./mw/Lock-red-alt-2.svg")right 0.1em center/9px no-repeat}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:url("./mw/Wikisource-logo.svg")right 0.1em center/12px no-repeat}body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-free a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-limited a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-registration a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .id-lock-subscription a,body:not(.skin-timeless):not(.skin-minerva) .mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background-size:contain;padding:0 1em 0 0}.mw-parser-output .cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:none;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;color:var(--color-error,#d33)}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{color:var(--color-error,#d33)}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#085;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right{padding-right:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .citation .mw-selflink{font-weight:inherit}@media screen{.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{color:#18911f}}@media screen and (prefers-color-scheme:dark){html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{color:#18911f}}
/* end https://en.wikipedia.org/ */
</style><cite id="CITEREFDrash2009" class="citation web cs1">Drash, Wayne (2009-12-08). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/12/08/cheating.spouses.lawsuits/">"Beware cheaters: Your lover's spouse can sue you"</a>. <i><a href="CNN" title="CNN">CNN</a></i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2015-02-26</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-2"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-2">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.bodyandsoul.com.au/mind-body/wellbeing/the-legal-reason-you-should-think-twice-about-that-illicit-affair/news-story/acd0723f4dae7dd967c94c3046543cd1">"The Legal Reason You Should Think Twice About That Illicit Affair"</a>. <i>bodyandsoulau</i>. January 7, 2019.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-3"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-3">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFCanada2001" class="citation web cs1">Canada, Supreme Court of (January 1, 2001). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/3998/index.do">"Supreme Court of Canada - SCC Case Information - Search"</a>. <i>scc-csc.lexum.com</i>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-4"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-4">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFBruton2016" class="citation news cs1">Bruton, H. Hunter (January 2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3831&context=dlj/">"The Questionable Constitutionality of Curtailing Cuckolding: Alienation of Affection and Criminal Conversation Torts"</a>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-5"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-5">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">note: <a href="Illinois" title="Illinois">Illinois</a> abolished this tort in 2016 <a rel="nofollow" class="external autonumber" href="http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=2019&ChapterID=57">[1]</a></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-6"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-6">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">H. Hunter Bruton, The Questionable Constitutionality of Curtailing Cuckolding: Alienation-of Affection and Criminal-Conversation Torts, 65 Duke L.J. 755 (2016). <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol65/iss4/3">http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol65/iss4/3</a></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-NYLaw-7"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-NYLaw_7-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text">N.Y. Civil Rights Law article 8, §§ 80-A to 84. <cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us/LAWSSEAF.cgi?QUERYTYPE=LAWS+&QUERYDATA=@SLCVR0A8+&LIST=LAW+&BROWSER=EXPLORER+&TOKEN=27541826+&TARGET=VIEW">"Causes of Action for Alienation of Affections, Criminal Conversion, Seduction and Breach of Contract to Marry Abolished"</a>. <a href="New_York_State_Assembly" title="New York State Assembly">New York State Assembly</a><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">February 7,</span> 2012</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-ILLaw-8"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-ILLaw_8-0">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"> <cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://rdklegal.com/in-chicago-illinois-can-i-sue-the-person-who-stole-my-wife-or-husband-from-me/">"Russell D. Knight, In Chicago, Illinois Can I Sue The Person Who Stole My Wife Or Husband From Me?"</a>. rdklegal.com<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">June 14,</span> 2020</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-:0-9"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-:0_9-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:0_9-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:0_9-2"><sup><i><b>c</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://washparkprophet.blogspot.com/2010/09/alienation-of-affections-tort-lives-in.html">"Wash Park Prophet: Alienation of Affections Tort Lives in NC and MS"</a>. <i>Wash Park Prophet</i>. 2010-09-13<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-03-01</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-10"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-10">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ms-supreme-court/1098192.html">Fitch v. Valentine</a> 959 So. 2d 1012 (2007). FindLaw. Retrieved 6 December 2017.</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-11"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-11">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFPoole" class="citation web cs1">Poole, Matthew. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.mspoole.com/alienation-of-affection-in-mississippi/">"Alienation of Affection in Mississippi"</a>. <i>MS Poole</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-02-28</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-12"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-12">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.today.com/news/millionaire-who-charmed-plumbers-wife-1C9017373">"The millionaire who charmed the plumber's wife"</a>. <i>TODAY.com</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-02-28</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-13"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-13">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation news cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2011-jun-08-la-na-weiner-list-20110608-story.html">"A decade of congressional sex scandals"</a>. <i>Los Angeles Times</i>. June 8, 2011<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">June 24,</span> 2021</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-14"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-14">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFBresnahan2009" class="citation news cs1">Bresnahan, John (July 16, 2009). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.politico.com/story/2009/07/pickerings-wife-sues-alleged-mistress-025067">"Pickering's wife sues alleged mistress"</a>. <i>Politico</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">June 24,</span> 2021</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-15"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-15">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFMott2009" class="citation magazine cs1">Mott, Ronni (July 16, 2009). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news/2009/jul/16/wife-says-pickerings-affair-ended-career-two/">"Wife Says Pickering's Affair Ended Career, Two Marriages"</a>. <i><a href="Jackson_Free_Press" title="Jackson Free Press">Jackson Free Press</a></i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">June 24,</span> 2021</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-16"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-16">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.abqjournal.com/biz/052216110944biz04-05-10.htm">"ABQJournal Biz: Alienation of affections tort mostly inapplicable in N.M."</a> <i>abqjournal.com</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-03-01</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-auto-17"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-auto_17-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-auto_17-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.ricefamilylaw.com/family/alienation-of-affection.htm">"Alienation of Affection & Criminal Conversation"</a>. Rice Law PLLC<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">22 January</span> 2014</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-18"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-18">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFGOMSTYN,_Alice2010" class="citation news cs1">GOMSTYN, Alice (2010-03-22). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://abcnews.go.com/Business/TheLaw/wife-wins-million-husbands-alleged-mistress/story?id=10151957">"Wife Wins $9 Million From Husband's Alleged Mistress"</a>. <i>ABC News</i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20100325023802/https://abcnews.go.com/Business/TheLaw/wife-wins-million-husbands-alleged-mistress/story?id=10151957">Archived</a> from the original on 25 March 2010<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2010-03-23</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-19"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-19">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/article215633900.html">"After jilted spouse wins $8.8M in alienation of affection lawsuit, we look at 3 NC cases"</a>. <i>newsobserver</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-02-28</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-20"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-20">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.ricefamilylaw.com/2011/05/01/not-your-average-cat-fight-alienation-of-affection-pays-30-million/">"Not Your Average Cat Fight: Alienation of Affection Pays $30 Million"</a>. <i>Rice Law</i>. 2011-05-01<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-02-28</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-ncga.state.nc.us-21"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-ncga.state.nc.us_21-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-ncga.state.nc.us_21-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><a href="North_Carolina_General_Assembly" title="North Carolina General Assembly">N.C. Gen. Stat.</a> § 52-13 (2010), (<i>available at</i> <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Sessions/2009/Bills/House/PDF/H1110v7.pdf">http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Sessions/2009/Bills/House/PDF/H1110v7.pdf</a> Retrieved 23-3-2010)</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-22"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-22">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/stealing-love-no-crime/">CBS report</a>, June 18, 2003</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-23"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-23">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.rosen.com/divorce/divorcearticles/alienation-of-affection/">"Alienation of Affection and Infidelity"</a>. <i>Rosen Law Firm - North Carolina Divorce</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">23 October</span> 2024</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-24"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-24">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Sessions/2009/Bills/House/PDF/H1110v7.pdf">"House Bill 1110 / Session Law 2009-400"</a> Retrieved 23-3-2010</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-25"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-25">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.journalnow.com/news/local/alienation-of-affection-law-unconstitutional-forsyth-county-judge-rules/article_bf87e30a-f32e-11e3-8ef6-0017a43b2370.html">"Alienation of affection law unconstitutional, Forsyth County judge rules"</a>. Winston-Salem Journal.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-26"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-26">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFEugene_Volkh" class="citation news cs1">Eugene Volkh. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/06/16/the-first-amendment-protects-a-right-to-engage-in-adultery/">"The First Amendment protects a right to engage in adultery?"</a>. <i>The Washington Post</i>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-27"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-27">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://caselaw.findlaw.com/nc-court-of-appeals/1873001.html">Malecek v. Williams</a> 804 S.E.2d 592 (2017). FindLaw. Retrieved 6 December 2017.</span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-:1-28"><span class="mw-cite-backlink">^ <a href="#cite_ref-:1_28-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-:1_28-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/crime/2018/11/12/despite-controversy-alienation-affection-cases-still-filed-south-dakota/1980451002/">"Despite controversy, 'alienation of affection' cases still filed in South Dakota"</a>. <i>Argus Leader</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-02-28</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-29"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-29">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/midwest/2007/10/30/84622.htm">"S.D. Court Says Insurance Does Not Cover Lawsuit on Wife Stealing"</a>. <i>Insurance Journal</i>. 2007-10-29<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-02-28</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-30"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-30">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFElefant2007" class="citation web cs1">Elefant, Carolyn (February 13, 2007). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2007/02/homeowners_insu.html">"Homeowners' Insurance Not the Same as Homewreckers' Insurance"</a>. <i>Legal Blog Watch</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-02-28</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-31"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-31">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite id="CITEREFSmeath2004" class="citation web cs1">Smeath, Doug (2004-09-26). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20151110041607/http://www.deseretnews.com/article/595094081/Alienated-spouses-can-sue.html">"Alienated spouses can sue"</a>. <i>DeseretNews.com</i>. Archived from <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.deseretnews.com/article/595094081/Alienated-spouses-can-sue.html">the original</a> on November 10, 2015<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-02-28</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-32"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-32">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation news cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/court-upholds-decision-in-alienation-of-affection-case/article_54374063-8f7c-563c-9dd5-be28871f08db.html">"Court upholds decision in alienation of affection case"</a>. <i>Daily Herald</i>. November 9, 2002. p. A8<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">March 1,</span> 2019</span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-33"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-33">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://www.religionnewsblog.com/2413/ex-husband-fails-in-suit-against-polygamists">"Ex-Husband Fails in Suit Against Polygamists"</a>. <i>Religion News Blog</i>. 2003-02-20<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-02-28</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
<li id="cite_note-34"><span class="mw-cite-backlink"><b><a href="#cite_ref-34">^</a></b></span> <span class="reference-text"><cite class="citation web cs1"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/19990315/2949597/ex-wife-says-sting-caused-on-job-affair----utah-agency-blamed-for-break-up">"Business | Ex-Wife Says Sting Caused On-Job Affair — Utah Agency Blamed For Break-Up"</a>. <i>community.seattletimes.nwsource.com</i><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">2019-03-01</span></span>.</cite></span>
</li>
</ol></div></div>
<div class="mw-heading mw-heading2"><h2 id="External_links">External links</h2></div>
<ul><li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/12/08/cheating.spouses.lawsuits/index.html">Alienation of Affections Explanation and Example</a>, 2009, <a href="CNN" title="CNN">CNN</a></li></ul></div><!--htdig_noindex--><div><div class="zim-footer">
This article is issued from <a class="external text" title="Last edited on 2024-12-31" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/?title=Alienation_of_affections&oldid=1266368260">Wikipedia</a>. The text is available under <a class="external text" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en">Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0</a> unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.
</div>
</div><!--/htdig_noindex--></div>
</div>
</main>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>